David Freddoso wrote an article suggesting that if the Republicans had nominated a “true conservative,” we might have a chance right now. I think HE’S wrong.
Let’s look at the choices we had at the time. I have actually come to like Romney, Giuliani and Huckabee much more since the primaries have ended, but that doesn’t change their records.
Mitt Romney was touted as the “true conservative.” I’m not sure why that was the case, because this guy was governor of Massachusetts. Massachusetts? Conservative? Nope, not a chance. People like Hannity would say he was conservative, but he had to change his positions to run for governor of Mass. Hannity assured listeners that Romney’s current views were his real views, then he would turn around and call Obama a flip-flopper. I’m sorry, bur Romney just moved to the right to make it through the primaries, thinking, as many do, that the redder he was the more votes he’d get. We were smarter than that this time.
Rudy Giuliani did a GREAT job during 9/11, but that was about the only thing I admired about him. Most of his positions were way out of touch with mine, and his personal history was very troubling. I’m VERY glad he got no traction.
Mike Huckabee was also touted as a conservative. Yes, he was very socially conservative, but his record in Arkansas showed otherwise. His race for lieutenant governor was run by Dick Morris, then fresh off the Clinton train. He ran Huckabee as a moderate in order to gain traction. As governor, he increased sales and gasoline taxes and also pushed for more bond programs, bigger health care programs, and a Robin Hood-type school funding program. Some say he reduced spending, but there was a budget shortfall during his term, so spending wasn’t reduced by much in the face of those tax increases. I’m boggled by his anti-bailout stance now, but maybe he’s setting himself up for a 2012 run against a country SICK of the extreme liberalization of the country under Obama, Pelosi, and Reid.
Then, we had John McCain. Well known, well tested, and he didn’t mind taking positions contrary to the party. Yes, he did oppose his own votes on immigration and the Bush tax cuts during the primaries. But, I think he was careful to only discuss things in those bills that he would agree with conservatives (building the wall and too much spending) while he just didn’t talk about his amnesty plan and how he thought the tax cuts were too big.
Freddoso argues that a true conservative would have stood up to the bailout. I’m not sure that Romney or Huckabee would have stood up to it. I know Huckabee has now, but what if his campaign was on the line at the time with the DOW plunging after the bill failed the first time. I don’t think Romney would have had the fortitude, either.
McCain was the only candidate who could actually win the general election. There was NO way the sheeple in this country were going to vote for a “conservative” because Bush was seen as dividing this country, and he was conservative. McCain could tout his true bipartisan record. He was till way more conservative than the Democratic nominee choices, and he was more conservative fiscally than most Republicans in Congress who saw the Iraq war as a way to push pet project spending through that wouldn’t get noticed because of the focus on the war.
McCain still has a chance if he just gets back on message. Obama sounds like he’s starting to whine and call McCain racist, and that will be a big mistake. If McCain can get his economic policy focused and together (that proposed rule suspension for seniors with 401Ks was so GENIUS that even Obama had to give him props), he can squeak this thing out.